Talk:How to handle freeloaders: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'Most freeloaders do not have a confirmed account (Green Lock) -- Um that fragment above is a bit out of the uh not with the rest of the open couchsurfing community. It is a tru…') |
Lemon-head (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
-- Um that fragment above is a bit out of the uh not with the rest of the open couchsurfing community. It is a true statement but aren't we trying to not promote verification as it is a poor secuirty control feature, if that meaeks sense. | -- Um that fragment above is a bit out of the uh not with the rest of the open couchsurfing community. It is a true statement but aren't we trying to not promote verification as it is a poor secuirty control feature, if that meaeks sense. | ||
== wtf == | |||
I think this article is quite unbalanced and naive, and needs some serious quality review. | |||
I see this article was copied from<br/> | |||
http://wiki.couchsurfing.org/en/How_to_handle_freeloaders<br/> | |||
Do we need to be more careful copying things? Or should we introduce a template for disputed quality? | |||
Revision as of 02:13, 8 December 2009
Most freeloaders do not have a confirmed account (Green Lock)
-- Um that fragment above is a bit out of the uh not with the rest of the open couchsurfing community. It is a true statement but aren't we trying to not promote verification as it is a poor secuirty control feature, if that meaeks sense.
wtf
I think this article is quite unbalanced and naive, and needs some serious quality review.
I see this article was copied from
http://wiki.couchsurfing.org/en/How_to_handle_freeloaders
Do we need to be more careful copying things? Or should we introduce a template for disputed quality?