Talk:CouchSurfing "conversion" issues: Difference between revisions
(re) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:Gardner Bickford|Gardner Bickford]] ([[User talk:Gardner Bickford|talk]]) 21:52, 22 December 2012 (CET) | [[User:Gardner Bickford|Gardner Bickford]] ([[User talk:Gardner Bickford|talk]]) 21:52, 22 December 2012 (CET) | ||
:A Benefit corporation is defined structure by US law, a B corporation is merely a label given out by a private third party organization called B-Lab. As far as I understood a Benefit corporation can not at the same time be a C corporation. Whereas CouchSurfing is a legally C corporation given a B corporation label. So how can B corp and Benefit corp be the same thing? They might be close but in the United States a C corporation "is legally bound to the singular purpose of profit-maximization for its shareholders". So I struggle to see how these are the same thing. | :A Benefit corporation is defined structure by US law in several states (which clearly have authority), a B corporation is merely a label given out by a private third party organization called B-Lab (which you claim has no authority). As far as I understood a Benefit corporation can not at the same time be a C corporation. Whereas CouchSurfing is a legally C corporation given a B corporation label. So how can B corp and Benefit corp be the same thing? They might be close but in the United States a C corporation "is legally bound to the singular purpose of profit-maximization for its shareholders". So I struggle to see how these are the same thing. | ||
:I understand that false allegations are not the best way to show anything. But looking at this from a bigger perspective we see that couchsurfing has a history of bending the truth, or at least not doing much to rectify any false claims, especially when they have been made in the advantage of couchsurfing. See for example [http://wiki.couchsurfing.org/en/Non-Profit_Corporation this page] claiming that "it is impossible for couchsurfing to make a profit" and that "it cannot be sold". I know I have written those words myself, but that was because was given the impression that this was truly so. Moreover this page has not been changed since January 2008. I'd say the burden is with couchsurfing whenever there is any form of doubt. | :I understand that false allegations are not the best way to show anything. But looking at this from a bigger perspective we see that couchsurfing has a history of bending the truth, or at least not doing much to rectify any false claims, especially when they have been made in the advantage of couchsurfing. See for example [http://wiki.couchsurfing.org/en/Non-Profit_Corporation this page] claiming that "it is impossible for couchsurfing to make a profit" and that "it cannot be sold". I know I have written those words myself, but that was because was given the impression that this was truly so. Moreover this page has not been changed since January 2008. I'd say the burden is with couchsurfing whenever there is any form of doubt. | ||
[[User:Guaka|guaka]] ([[User talk:Guaka|talk]]) 10:56, 23 December 2012 (CET) | [[User:Guaka|guaka]] ([[User talk:Guaka|talk]]) 10:56, 23 December 2012 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 23 December 2012
This reads like a heavily biased diatribe and may not be the most constructive way to encourage people to make the switch to BeWelcome.
- A benefit corporation and a b-corp are the same thing.
- CouchSurfing is still listed on B-Labs website. Doling out allegations of falsifying applications to B-Labs with no proof discredits the author of this document. Aside from that B-Labs has no authority, they merely provide a consulting service to help corporations meet state guidelines.
Gardner Bickford (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2012 (CET)
- A Benefit corporation is defined structure by US law in several states (which clearly have authority), a B corporation is merely a label given out by a private third party organization called B-Lab (which you claim has no authority). As far as I understood a Benefit corporation can not at the same time be a C corporation. Whereas CouchSurfing is a legally C corporation given a B corporation label. So how can B corp and Benefit corp be the same thing? They might be close but in the United States a C corporation "is legally bound to the singular purpose of profit-maximization for its shareholders". So I struggle to see how these are the same thing.
- I understand that false allegations are not the best way to show anything. But looking at this from a bigger perspective we see that couchsurfing has a history of bending the truth, or at least not doing much to rectify any false claims, especially when they have been made in the advantage of couchsurfing. See for example this page claiming that "it is impossible for couchsurfing to make a profit" and that "it cannot be sold". I know I have written those words myself, but that was because was given the impression that this was truly so. Moreover this page has not been changed since January 2008. I'd say the burden is with couchsurfing whenever there is any form of doubt.