Meeting Minutes/2020-04-13 Hackweek - references session: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{meeting-minutes}} | |||
History At the begining, refs were not needed (similar people) and the size of the community was too small. | History At the begining, refs were not needed (similar people) and the size of the community was too small. | ||
Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
* Encourage people to leave references | * Encourage people to leave references | ||
* Activity or experience number in profile summary-area: Number of references in the last 6 months? Similar to “last seen 2 months ago” thing. | * Activity or experience number in profile summary-area: Number of references in the last 6 months? Similar to “last seen 2 months ago” thing. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:47, 28 October 2022
History At the begining, refs were not needed (similar people) and the size of the community was too small.
How do you actually trust profile? * When you see picture * When you can read more about them * When they have friends * Life outside Trustroots
References as: * Security/safety feature * A way to say “thank you” * Indication of experience * Indication of like-mindedness
No “negative” “vs positive” Removing green/red as connotation of good/bad Free text description; load on support?
Demo:
- Invitation only feature — history + data
- +1 idea to tribe belonging
- reference people according to meet in person
- report ppl when you give negative ref
- 3rd step is free-text
Invitation-only feature
- it was not in the very beginning
- introduced in Spring 2017 to get more quality on UX
- Autumn 2018 feature was removed
New ideas:
- connect feature with “add as contact” feature? tie refereces closer to contacts as a way to lower the barrier to get references, also solves problems around “this profile doesn’t have references” — highlight them that they have contacts instead.
- show only “this person has hosted someone within 6 months” -type of indication about activity, hide “no” / “yes” answers publicly
- it’s problematic to collect “yes”/“no” replies first privately, then publish them later on
- giving a “matching score” about like-minded people can be misleading.
- option to say “haven’t met them”
- guidelines for writing free text
- how much do you trust the person?
- at some point have a minimum measure for new profiles to be allowed to leave references (but not in the beginning)
- How do we not make the freetext field a popularity contest?
Action items
Team 1
who: Abel, Dario branch: https://github.com/Trustroots/trustroots/tree/references-private-experience
Change question to “did you feel comfortable hosting this person/being guest/meeting them?”- ask michal: How do we have to handle the translation of strings? Do the json files update automatically?
- Change colors from red/green to neutral
- ask michal: How do we have to handle the translation of strings? Do the json files update automatically?
- Check expected behaviour and database storing
- How is stored in db when you check more than one option of how do you know them
- go through other UI to make sure that texts are clear what is public/what is not
Team 2
who: Nick, Edvard, Michal
- Add guidelines how to fill freetext, what to write in it? describe more the person, not the event/place. Ideas:
- “What would you add to this profile?”
- [michal] first of all, what culture of references do we want to encourage?
- [michal] how to use non-judgmental language, say I had that experience rather than this person is such and such. What else is important in non-violent communication?
- Add public freetext
- Remove frontend display of negative / positive refs
- public fields in listing: hosted or not, free text, people, date
- ensure backend API only returns public fields
- PR for listing references, needs rebasing and reworking a bit: https://github.com/Trustroots/trustroots/pull/918
Steps
- add freetext field in the backend/database model + add freetext field to the backend API + maybe backend tests for those parts
- TODO: feedbackPublic is optional, but should it have a minimum/maximum length (max:2000, min:none)
- TODO: check about email notification message
- TODO: check about push notification message
- TODO: what format should the message be in? plaintext, or rich text with mediumeditor?
- TODO: if with mediumeditor then we need to check the maximum is plaintext value
- restrict which fields are viewable for other members (i.e. the “did you feel comfortable” bit (and other stuff?) should be kept private)
- later… some more UI stuff
To distribute
- Keep the 2 week period,
- General question: Will references be available in the “Download your data” section?
- Just add it there and it will. :-) -Mikael
Nice-haves:
- Possibly private free text?
- Encourage people to leave references
- Activity or experience number in profile summary-area: Number of references in the last 6 months? Similar to “last seen 2 months ago” thing.