Wiki.trustroots.org:Domain name: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Flows off the tongue the most smoothly [[User:Luna1|Luna1]] | * Flows off the tongue the most smoothly [[User:Luna1|Luna1]] | ||
* I am for this one: it seems to me the word ''wiki'' is the main one, and the ''couch'' part is only describing better its aims, so... [[User:Dan°|Dan°]] 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | * I am for this one: it seems to me the word ''wiki'' is the main one, and the ''couch'' part is only describing better its aims, so... [[User:Dan°|Dan°]] 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
* It's the obvious name for a wiki related to couchsurfing (may be not for the others hospitality networks). I personally prefer something more general, but it should be fine for me --[[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
===Hospitalitywiki.org=== | ===Hospitalitywiki.org=== | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
* This is my favourite, but I agree it might be the "hat" holding several other projects inside of it and not limited to hospex only [[User:Flapic|Flapic]] | * This is my favourite, but I agree it might be the "hat" holding several other projects inside of it and not limited to hospex only [[User:Flapic|Flapic]] | ||
* Agree with both of you on this one [[User:Luna1|Luna1]] | * Agree with both of you on this one [[User:Luna1|Luna1]] | ||
* It seems I agree also with the previous, I'm really curious about the coming "something else"--[[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:31, 15 October 2009
Several possible domain names have been registered for Couchwiki:
- wikicouch.org
- couchwiki.org
- hospitalitywiki.org
- nomadwiki.org
So the question is: which one do we want to use as our canonical domain name? Leave your preference and comment on this page. We'll come up with a deadline for the votes when it's more clear.
Options
Wikicouch.org
- Ok, but I like the sound of couchwiki more. guaka 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Couchwiki.org
- I like this one most, also because it goes well with Trashwiki and Hitchwiki :) But I'm fine with the other options as well. guaka 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I also like this one the most, it is easiest to understand by outsiders kilgoretrout 15:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Flows off the tongue the most smoothly Luna1
- I am for this one: it seems to me the word wiki is the main one, and the couch part is only describing better its aims, so... Dan° 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's the obvious name for a wiki related to couchsurfing (may be not for the others hospitality networks). I personally prefer something more general, but it should be fine for me --Bikepunk 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hospitalitywiki.org
- More general. Slightly neutral towards this one. guaka 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- This general and neutral name is my favourite Midsch 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Midsch, but what about making it even more general as Hospexwiki? Flapic
- I agree with Flapic. Matrixpoint 17:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Midsch, Flapic, Matrixpoint but don't like the full word but like shorter HospXwiki Luna1 19:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Nomadwiki.org
- Probably useful for a project with a different angle. Use later for something else :) guaka 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- This is my favourite, but I agree it might be the "hat" holding several other projects inside of it and not limited to hospex only Flapic
- Agree with both of you on this one Luna1
- It seems I agree also with the previous, I'm really curious about the coming "something else"--Bikepunk 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Discussion and comments
Note that if at any point, there is convergence towards a domain name that is not yet registered it should be registered asap. guaka 00:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)