|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ==Options==
| | gAENby <a href="http:// xwgqcwvpyvqm.com/"> xwgqcwvpyvqm</a>, [url=http:// zazzqmbuoodw.com/] zazzqmbuoodw[/url], [link=http:// qiiboitrtqop.com/] qiiboitrtqop[/link], http:// urinayryxvcm.com/ |
| n6Iofh <a href="http://rngthwhpusvn.com/">rngthwhpusvn</a>, [url=http://tliyweyyqvff.com/]tliyweyyqvff[/url], [link=http://coxlawkgmdpq.com/]coxlawkgmdpq[/link], http://vwweqfzueuwe.com/
| |
| | |
| ===Couchwiki.org===
| |
| * I like this one most, also because it goes well with [[:trash:|Trashwiki]] and [[:hitch:|Hitchwiki]] :) But I'm fine with the other options as well. [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I also like this one the most, it is easiest to understand by outsiders [[User:Kilgoretrout|kilgoretrout]] 15:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ** ''Why is it the easiest to understand for outsiders? If someone never heard about "couchsurfing" before, would this person automatically know what "couchwiki" is about? I would say no.''--[[Special:Contributions/85.176.204.205|85.176.204.205]] 14:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * Flows off the tongue the most smoothly [[User:Luna1|Luna1]]
| |
| * I am for this one: it seems to me the word ''wiki'' is the main one, and the ''couch'' part is only describing better its aims, so... [[User:Dan°|Dan°]] 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * It's the obvious name for a wiki related to couchsurfing (may be not for the others hospitality networks). I personally prefer something more general, but it should be fine for me --[[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I am for this name. Antoine
| |
| * I like the sound, but Casey and friends have totally captured the couch-x namespace. --[[User:Lemon-head|Lemon-head]] 18:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * You should have gone through : CouchsurfingWiki.org but, may be it is in accordance with the LT LA ? Ocbd
| |
| | |
| ===Hospitalitywiki.org===
| |
| * More general. Slightly neutral towards this one. [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * This general and neutral name is my favourite [[User:Midsch|Midsch]] 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I agree with Midsch, but what about making it even more general as Hospexwiki? [[User:Flapic|Flapic]]
| |
| * I agree with Flapic. [[User:Matrixpoint|Matrixpoint]] 17:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I agree with Midsch, Flapic, Matrixpoint but don't like the full word but like shorter HospXwiki [[User:Luna1|Luna1]] 19:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I like the HospXwiki, it sounds a bit from star trek but I like it very much :) --[[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] 06:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * Makes the most sense, but I was never a friend of the terms "hospex" or "hospitality" - these words just sound awkward and unwieldy and unsexy. HospX makes this look fancy, but the sound is still the same. --[[User:Lemon-head|Lemon-head]] 18:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * I would prefer a more general name. When i hear "couchwiki" i would think more about furniture than Hospitality Exchange. Keep in mind that most people in the world don't even own a couch.--[[User:Globetrotter tt|Globetrotter tt]] 05:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Nomadwiki.org===
| |
| * Probably useful for a project with a different angle. Use later for something else :) [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 01:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| * This is my favourite, but I agree it might be the "hat" holding several other projects inside of it and not limited to hospex only [[User:Flapic|Flapic]]
| |
| * Agree with both of you on this one [[User:Luna1|Luna1]]
| |
| * It seems I agree also with the previous, I'm really curious about the coming "something else"--[[User:Bikepunk|Bikepunk]] 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| w8kGyE <a href="http:// wgxfeokqbxff.com/"> wgxfeokqbxff</a>, [url=http:// xppnittwtdjv.com/] xppnittwtdjv[/url], [link=http:// mocslmntogkr.com/] mocslmntogkr[/link], http:// nzdtpmqgvaer.com/ | |