Talk:BW Rox to Drupal database migration: Difference between revisions
[[Trustroots Wiki]] is an independent wiki with information for people who are actively exchanging hospitality.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with 'I would probably focus on the following: addresses comments donations feedbackcategories feedbacks geo_hierarchy geo_location geo_type geo_usage geonames_admincodes geonames_alt…' |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would probably focus on the following: | I would probably focus on the following: | ||
<pre> | |||
addresses | addresses | ||
comments | comments | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
members_updating_status | members_updating_status | ||
membersgroups | membersgroups | ||
</pre> | |||
Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important. | Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important. | ||
[[User:Fake51|Fake51]] 18:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks. The tables aren't really kept as they are right now, as it's all being Drupalized. I mainly need to know which tables need to be migrated (and which ones are optional). [[User:Guaka|guaka]] 18:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 25 August 2011
I would probably focus on the following:
addresses comments donations feedbackcategories feedbacks geo_hierarchy geo_location geo_type geo_usage geonames_admincodes geonames_alternate_names geonames_cache geonames_cache_backup geonames_countries geonames_timezones groups groups_locations groupshierarchy members_groups_subscribed members_roles members_tags_subscribed members_threads_subscribed members_updating_status membersgroups
Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.
Fake51 18:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. The tables aren't really kept as they are right now, as it's all being Drupalized. I mainly need to know which tables need to be migrated (and which ones are optional). guaka 18:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
