Talk:Zeemax deletion case - Revision history

Maya GENEVA at 13:29, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T13:29:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 17 November 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	to sum it up:		to sum it up:
	Julien has omitted to incorporate two important ~~two~~ elements into the report:		Julien has omitted to incorporate two important elements into the report:

	# Two times flounting of MSDT ~~recommentations~~ since 1 August 2009 and		# Two times flounting of MSDT recommendations since 1 August 2009 and
	# openly racist comments (directed towards Chinese and Indians) and proven harassment (see the repeated mention of "hag") No need to be specific. Links are enough.		# openly racist comments (directed towards Chinese and Indians) and proven harassment (see the repeated mention of "hag") No need to be specific. Links are enough.

Guaka: ##

2009-11-17T08:00:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:00, 17 November 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Julien has omitted to incorporate two important two elements into the report:		Julien has omitted to incorporate two important two elements into the report:

	1. Two times flounting of MSDT recommentations since 1 August 2009 and		# Two times flounting of MSDT recommentations since 1 August 2009 and
			# openly racist comments (directed towards Chinese and Indians) and proven harassment (see the repeated mention of "hag") No need to be specific. Links are enough.
	2. openly racist comments (directed towards Chinese and Indians) and proven harassment (see the repeated mention of "hag") No need to be specific. Links are enough.

	The sentence: "I'm confident that, had they known, they would have acted differently" is misleading. Julien cannot, must not speak for me.		The sentence: "I'm confident that, had they known, they would have acted differently" is misleading. Julien cannot, must not speak for me.

Maya GENEVA at 07:41, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T07:41:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 17 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Zeemax		Zeemax
	14 Nov 2009		14 Nov 2009

			----

			See http://www.couchsurfing.org/group_read.html?gid=20166&post=4255319#post4317293

			and http://www.couchsurfing.org/group_read.html?gid=20166&post=4255319#post4319721

			to sum it up:
			Julien has omitted to incorporate two important two elements into the report:

			1. Two times flounting of MSDT recommentations since 1 August 2009 and

			2. openly racist comments (directed towards Chinese and Indians) and proven harassment (see the repeated mention of "hag") No need to be specific. Links are enough.

			The sentence: "I'm confident that, had they known, they would have acted differently" is misleading. Julien cannot, must not speak for me.

			Thank you.

			Maya
			17 November 2009

Zeemax at 09:04, 14 November 2009

2009-11-14T09:04:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 14 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I undid the revision 1301 by IP 85.102.208.47, which was a copy/paste of entire portions of a CS thread. The link to this particular thread has already been given by Julien, and reproducing conversations was merely an attempt to obfuscate and subvert the purpose of this thread.		I undid the revision 1301 by IP 85.102.208.47, which was a copy/paste of entire portions of a CS thread. The link to this particular thread has already been given by Julien, and reproducing conversations was merely an attempt to obfuscate and subvert the purpose of this thread.

			Zeemax
			14 Nov 2009

Zeemax: Created page with 'I undid the revision 1301 by IP 85.102.208.47, which was a copy/paste of entire portions of a CS thread. The link to this particular thread has already been given by Julien, and …'

2009-11-14T09:03:47Z

Created page with 'I undid the revision 1301 by IP 85.102.208.47, which was a copy/paste of entire portions of a CS thread. The link to this particular thread has already been given by Julien, and …'

New page

I undid the revision 1301 by IP 85.102.208.47, which was a copy/paste of entire portions of a CS thread. The link to this particular thread has already been given by Julien, and reproducing conversations was merely an attempt to obfuscate and subvert the purpose of this thread.