Talk:BW Rox to Drupal database migration - Revision history

Guaka at 18:28, 25 August 2011

2011-08-25T18:28:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 25 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would probably focus on the following:		I would probably focus on the following:

			<pre>
	addresses		addresses
	comments		comments
Line 25:		Line 26:
	members_updating_status		members_updating_status
	membersgroups		membersgroups
			</pre>

	Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.		Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.

	[[User:Fake51\|Fake51]] 18:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		[[User:Fake51\|Fake51]] 18:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

			:Thanks. The tables aren't really kept as they are right now, as it's all being Drupalized. I mainly need to know which tables need to be migrated (and which ones are optional). [[User:Guaka\|guaka]] 18:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Fake51 at 18:25, 25 August 2011

2011-08-25T18:25:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 25 August 2011
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.		Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.

			[[User:Fake51\|Fake51]] 18:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Fake51: Created page with 'I would probably focus on the following: addresses comments donations feedbackcategories feedbacks geo_hierarchy geo_location geo_type geo_usage geonames_admincodes geonames_alt…'

2011-08-25T18:24:27Z

Created page with 'I would probably focus on the following: addresses comments donations feedbackcategories feedbacks geo_hierarchy geo_location geo_type geo_usage geonames_admincodes geonames_alt…'

New page

I would probably focus on the following:

addresses
comments
donations
feedbackcategories
feedbacks
geo_hierarchy
geo_location
geo_type
geo_usage
geonames_admincodes
geonames_alternate_names
geonames_cache
geonames_cache_backup
geonames_countries
geonames_timezones
groups
groups_locations
groupshierarchy
members_groups_subscribed
members_roles
members_tags_subscribed
members_threads_subscribed
members_updating_status
membersgroups

Throw out the users table, btw, stick with members only - the important data should be duplicated anyway, the rest shouldn't be needed. From the above list, groups might also be more of a nice to have rather than very important.